I’ve talked a bit in the past about how I am probably best categorized (if you must) as pro-life in the abortion debate, but that I do not associate with the pro-life movement because I think it is counterproductive. That is, a lot of what the pro-life movement is doing will not lead to fewer abortions, which, being pro-life, is my ultimate goal.
I’ve disassociated with the pro-choice movement over the last few years for similar reasons – I don’t think that tack will lead to fewer abortions either. To me, both sides make good points, but an actual solution which will reduce the number of abortions occurring has to be a hybridization of the two positions, throwing out a lot of trash in the process.
This is actually one of those rare examples where a person has changed their mind because of what people who disagreed with him said over time. I used to be solidly pro-choice, but a combination of talking to people and doing my own research for an ethics final cemented my new position.
Anyway, explaining where I’m at would take a characteristically long time, but here is an interesting article putting forth a Democratic abortion-reduction plank. Its actually a little creepy and exhilarating, because the ideas they’re (finally) putting out there could have been drawn from my ethics final almost exactly. It’s a start, at least. I’ve got a lot more to say, and I’m sure the Democrats for Life have a lot more to say as well.
But maybe this is a start.
Thanks to the Bishop for the link.